Practice question
A warehouse worker proves an employment relationship. He later stops reporting and alleges dismissal. The company denies dismissing him. The record contains no substantial evidence of a discharge or circumstances constituting constructive dismissal. The worker argues that constitutional tenure alone resolves the missing proof. Which is correct?
- Tenure supplies the missing historical fact.
- Employment automatically proves every later alleged dismissal.
- Every cessation of attendance is an illegal dismissal.
- The company loses merely because it is an employer.
- Tenure does not dispense with the worker's initial burden to establish dismissal.
Legal references
- 1987 Constitution Article XIII Section 3: https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html
- Simon v Results Companies, G.R. 249351-52, March 29 2022, main opinion: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2022/mar2022/gr_249351-52_2022.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.