Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Ratified International Labour Organization (ILO) Conventions

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A June 2026 memorandum correctly identifies C190 as in force for the Philippines, but concludes that every sentence of the Convention automatically supplies a private damages action of any amount against every employer without examining its terms or domestic law. Which is the sound response?
  1. Treaty status alone proves every employee’s factual allegation
  2. Ratification makes the Recommendation a statute too
  3. In-force treaty status matters, but the asserted remedy still requires analysis of the instrument’s provisions and applicable domestic law
  4. C190 had not yet entered into force for the Philippines
  5. No ratified Convention can ever be relevant domestically

Legal references

  • ILO, Conventions, Protocols and Recommendations; UN Treaty Collection, C190 Philippine status: https://www.ilo.org/international-labour-standards/conventions-protocols-and-recommendations
  • UN Treaty Collection, C190, Philippine entry into force: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280559e75

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.