Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Study Settings View Stats

Topic

Question Type

Essay Multiple Choice

Question Source

All Jurisprudence based

0 tracked cards Political and Public International Law

Congress properly proposes a constitutional change and schedules ratification for the twentieth day after approval. Proponents admit the Article XVII period but argue that economic urgency and overwhelming congressional support allow them to shorten it. No other constitutional timing provision applies. Which conclusion is correct?

Choose the Best Answer

The President may shorten any constitutional period by press statement. The twentieth-day schedule violates the rule requiring a plebiscite not earlier than sixty nor later than ninety days after approval. Every proposal must wait exactly five years before any plebiscite. Congressional support is legally identical to ratification.

Load another random question

Your Progress

No data Retention

Tracked Cards: 0
Accuracy: No data
Retained: 0

View Detailed Analytics

Difficulty Breakdown

Answer flashcards to build a real score-based difficulty breakdown.

Current Streak 0 Days

Start a streak with this card.

Suggested Decks

View All

Leech Cards

Review

No recent weak flashcards in your saved workbook.