Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Study Settings View Stats

Topic

Question Type

Essay Multiple Choice

Question Source

All Jurisprudence based

0 tracked cards Criminal Law

An accountable public officer, through proved negligence, allows another person to take public money under his custody. He argues that Article 217 cannot apply because he did not personally receive the money. Which is correct?

Choose the Best Answer

Personal receipt by the officer is indispensable in every malversation case. Only technical malversation can cover any missing public money. Article 217 includes permitting another to take accountable public funds through abandonment or negligence. Negligence can never be relevant to malversation.

Load another random question

Your Progress

No data Retention

Tracked Cards: 0
Accuracy: No data
Retained: 0

View Detailed Analytics

Difficulty Breakdown

Answer flashcards to build a real score-based difficulty breakdown.

Current Streak 0 Days

Start a streak with this card.

Suggested Decks

View All

Leech Cards

Review

No recent weak flashcards in your saved workbook.