Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Study Settings View Stats

Topic

Question Type

Essay Multiple Choice

Question Source

All Jurisprudence based

0 tracked cards Political and Public International Law

An applicant has little income and resources presently unavailable for the family’s food, shelter and basic necessities. A court evaluates the ex parte application and hearing under Section 21. An objector insists that only the applicant’s personal food may be considered and that shelter and family necessities are irrelevant. Which is correct?

Choose the Best Answer

The objection conflicts with the rule’s express reference to food, shelter and basic necessities for the party and family A political endorsement supplies the only valid test Only the applicant’s food counts The applicant’s living conditions can never be examined

Load another random question

Your Progress

No data Retention

Tracked Cards: 0
Accuracy: No data
Retained: 0

View Detailed Analytics

Difficulty Breakdown

Answer flashcards to build a real score-based difficulty breakdown.

Current Streak 0 Days

Start a streak with this card.

Suggested Decks

View All

Leech Cards

Review

No recent weak flashcards in your saved workbook.