Question

Identify the correct interpretation of doubtful statutes based on the given scenarios:

1. Scenario 1:
   
   In a criminal case, the accused is charged with violating a statute that prohibits the possession of illegal drugs for personal use. The statute, however, does not define the term "possession" nor specify the quantity of drugs that would constitute a violation. Should the court interpret the statute strictly or liberally?
   
   Explain your answer.
2. Scenario 2:
   
   An employee is terminated by the employer for committing habitual tardiness. The labor law states that "habitual tardiness is a just cause for termination." The term "habitual tardiness" is not explicitly defined in the labor law. Can the employee argue that the term should be interpreted strictly or liberally?
   
   Justify your response.
3. Scenario 3:
   
   A homeowner enters into a contract with a contractor to build a house. The contract specifies that the house should be completed within "a reasonable time." However, the contract does not define what constitutes "a reasonable time." In case of a dispute between the homeowner and the contractor regarding the timeline of completion, should the court interpret the phrase "a reasonable time" strictly or liberally?
   
   Support your answer.