Practice question
Distinguish reckless imprudence from simple imprudence under Article 365. Why is absence of malice not a complete defense to a negligence charge?
Legal references
- RA 10951, current amended RPC provisions and monetary thresholds: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2017/ra_10951_2017.html; Section 97, amended Article 365.
- Ivler v Modesto-San Pedro, G.R. No. 172716, November 17, 2010, main decision, one quasi-offense and double jeopardy: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/nov2010/gr_172716_2010.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.