Practice question
A legitimate child stays temporarily with an identified relative for lawful care. The evidence excludes substitution, simulation and any intent to cause loss of civil status. The prosecution invokes only Article347 concealment because the child was away from home. Is location alone sufficient?
- Yes, every temporary family visit is criminal concealment
- No; the required prohibited conduct and specified intent must be established
- Yes, any child outside the home loses civil status
- Yes, the relative’s address supplies all elements
- Yes, lawful care automatically proves abandonment
Legal references
- RA10951 Section90, amended Article347, child substitution and concealment: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2017/ra_10951_2017.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.