Practice question
A simple-seduction charge under Article338 establishes the minor’s age and a sexual relationship but the evidence affirmatively excludes deceit and no other basis is proved. The prosecutor says age alone supplies every Article338 element. What is missing?
- Only an older reviewer’s age threshold
- The expressly required means of deceit
- Only the offender’s signature on a school form
- Nothing, because all relationships are automatically Article338
- Only a financial-loss calculation
Legal references
- RA11648 Section2, amended RPC Articles337-338, current seduction provisions: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11648_2022.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.