Practice question
An insolvent convict receives a fixed-duration principal penalty lawfully executed through specified nonconfinement deprivations and a fine. The case satisfies Rule4 and the preceding conversion limits. An officer substitutes an unrelated deprivation solely because the fine remains unpaid. What does Rule4 require instead?
- Continuation of the same principal-penalty deprivations during the lawful subsidiary period
- Any deprivation the officer prefers
- Automatic execution of a different felony penalty
- No period or limits are ever relevant
- The officer may replace the judgment at will
Legal references
- RA10159 Section1, amended RPC Article39, subsidiary liability rules1-5: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2012/ra_10159_2012.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.