Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Threefold Rule

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

For service under Article 70, assume successive fixed penalties of ten, six, four, and two years, totaling twenty-two years. No credits or other adjustments are involved. An official says the prisoner must serve thirty years because three times the most severe term is thirty. Which is correct?
  1. Thirty years is mandatory because the cap always creates additional time.
  2. Forty years is mandatory instead.
  3. The threefold rule is a ceiling; it does not enlarge the twenty-two years actually imposed.
  4. Only the two-year sentence survives.
  5. All sentences merge into ten years.

Legal references

  • Commonwealth Act No. 217, Section 2 amending RPC Article 70, simultaneous and successive service and threefold rule: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/29/15348
  • Mejorada v Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. L-51065-72, June 30, 1987, main decision, service rather than imposition: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1987/jun1987/gr_l-51065_1987.html
  • People v Escares, G.R. Nos. L-11128-33, December 23, 1957, main decision, separate penalties and Article 70 service: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1957/dec1957/gr_l-11128-33_1957.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.