Practice question
A prisoner validly receives full Article 29 credit that completes the deprivation-of-liberty component. A separately enforceable fine remains unpaid. He claims the detention credit itself proves cash payment of that fine. Which is sound?
- The credit’s service effect must be distinguished from satisfaction of the fine under its governing rules.
- Every credit is conclusive proof of a money transfer.
- All fines vanish automatically once credit is calculated.
- The prisoner may choose any cash-equivalent rate.
- The fine necessarily becomes the victim’s paid damages.
Legal references
- RA 10592, Section 1, amended Article 29, including destierro and actual detention: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2013/ra_10592_2013.html
- Guinto v. Department of Justice, G.R. Nos. 249027 and 249155, April 3, 2024, en banc main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/apr2024/gr_249027_2024.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.