Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Spontaneous Desistance

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A complainant’s later affidavit concerns whether to pursue a case, while independent proof shows the offender was physically prevented from finishing the intended acts. The defense conflates the two uses of desistance. Which is sound?
  1. The affidavit conclusively establishes the offender’s earlier free choice.
  2. Keep the complainant’s procedural act separate from Article 6’s execution-based inquiry.
  3. The term’s spelling controls regardless of context.
  4. A private document automatically reverses all historical facts.
  5. No evidence of external restraint may be considered.

Legal references

  • Revised Penal Code, Articles 6-8 and 304-305 (cited provisions): https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/28/20426
  • Penaranda v. People, G.R. No. 214426, December 2, 2021, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/dec2021/gr_214426_2021.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.