Practice question
A robber completes the taking and kills a pursuer to facilitate escape. All robbery-related elements are proved. Does completion of taking alone compel separate treatment?
- No; Esugon recognizes the robbery-related escape killing
- Yes; no death after taking can ever qualify
- Yes; escape is always independent by definition
- Yes; the robbery is legally erased
- Yes; physical chronology replaces every connection inquiry
Legal references
- People v Esugon GR195244 June22,2015 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2015/jun2015/gr_195244_2015.html
- People v Balanag GR103225 September15,1994 MAIN, different robbery and homicide victims: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1994/sep1994/gr_103225_1994.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.