Philippine Bar review · Topic

Continuous/Continued Crime (Delito Continuado) vs. Continuing/Transitory Crime

Page 2 of practice questions on Continuous/Continued Crime (Delito Continuado) vs. Continuing/Transitory Crime in Plurality of Crimes. Browse published…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Does an accused’s arrest in a city alone establish Rule110 Section15(a) venue if no offense or essential ingredient occ…
  2. A prosecution relies solely on the complainant’s later move to CityC, where no essential ingredient occurred. Under the…
  3. Two acts are stipulated to be partial execution of one indivisible obstruction design concerning the same preliminary i…
  4. An accused prevents the same witness from attending one preliminary investigation and later presents a false affidavit …
  5. One offense’s essential ingredients occur in CitiesA andB. The accused is arrested in CityC, where none occurred. No sp…
  6. Explain Navaja’s treatment of the two acts directed at the same preliminary investigation.
  7. Why do alternative territorial venues not necessarily create two substantive offenses?
  8. Can arrest location or a complainant’s later residence replace the ordinary essential-ingredient venue inquiry?