Philippine Bar review · Topic
Continuous/Continued Crime (Delito Continuado) vs. Continuing/Transitory Crime
Page 2 of practice questions on Continuous/Continued Crime (Delito Continuado) vs. Continuing/Transitory Crime in Plurality of Crimes. Browse published…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does an accused’s arrest in a city alone establish Rule110 Section15(a) venue if no offense or essential ingredient occ…
- A prosecution relies solely on the complainant’s later move to CityC, where no essential ingredient occurred. Under the…
- Two acts are stipulated to be partial execution of one indivisible obstruction design concerning the same preliminary i…
- An accused prevents the same witness from attending one preliminary investigation and later presents a false affidavit …
- One offense’s essential ingredients occur in CitiesA andB. The accused is arrested in CityC, where none occurred. No sp…
- Explain Navaja’s treatment of the two acts directed at the same preliminary investigation.
- Why do alternative territorial venues not necessarily create two substantive offenses?
- Can arrest location or a complainant’s later residence replace the ordinary essential-ingredient venue inquiry?