Practice question
A convict travels to a state with an applicable Philippine extradition treaty. Assume no surrender, capture, new crime or other interruption. The prosecution invokes only Article93’s foreign-country clause. Is proof of foreign travel alone sufficient under that clause?
- No; that clause specifies a country without an extradition treaty
- Yes; the clause ignores treaty status
- Yes; every passport use interrupts
- Yes; every international ticket is surrender
- Yes; travel constitutes capture
Legal references
- Revised Penal Code, relevant Articles: https://lawphil.net/statutes/acts/act1930/act_3815_1930.html Articles90,92–93.
- Basilonia v Villaruz GR191370-71 August10,2015 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2015/aug2015/gr_191370_2015.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.