Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Marriage between Offender and Offended Party

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A principal in a stipulated covered abduction validly marries the adult offended party after conviction. A convicted accessory after the fact in that same offense seeks the paragraph’s benefit. The prosecutor says only pretrial marriages count. Which response is correct?
  1. Article344 covers already imposed penalties and expressly includes accessories after the fact
  2. The prosecutor is correct because conviction always bars the benefit
  3. Only accomplices are included
  4. A new criminal offense is created by the wedding
  5. Every civil obligation automatically disappears

Legal references

  • Revised Penal Code, relevant Articles: https://lawphil.net/statutes/acts/act1930/act_3815_1930.html Article344, marriage and co-offenders; Articles89 and113.
  • RA8353 rape-specific Article266-C: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1997/ra_8353_1997.html
  • RA11596 valid-marriage limitation: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2021/ra_11596_2021.html
  • RA11648 current sexual-offense amendments: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11648_2022.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.