Practice question
A valid hypothetical amnesty covers specified political acts during a defined period and expressly excludes crimes committed solely for personal ends. A person seeks it for unrelated private fraud. Which is correct?
- Every offense by a politically active person is covered
- The express scope and exclusion defeat the asserted coverage on these facts
- A court must ignore the proclamation’s terms
- Personal profit is always political
- Applying once automatically extinguishes every liability
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html — Constitution Article VII section 19: presidential amnesty and concurrence of a majority of all Members of Congress.
- https://lawphil.net/statutes/acts/act1930/act_3815_1930.html — RPC Articles89(3) and113: amnesty’s penal effect and survival of civil liability.
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/apr2024/gr_241494_2024.html — Trillanes v. Medialdea, G.R. 241494,256660 and256078, April 3, 2024, main decision: legal effect, coverage, legislative concurrence and due process in revocation.
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1949/jan1949/gr_l-1278_1949.html — Barrioquinto v. Fernandez, G.R. L-1278, January 21, 1949, main decision: amnesty distinguished from pardon.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.