Practice question
A party overreads Trillanes to claim that a document called an amnesty certificate is irrebuttable even where authenticity is specifically disproved by clear competent evidence. Which is sound?
- The title alone validates every forgery forever.
- The case’s evidentiary protection is not an absolute rule validating every forged or disproved document.
- No lawful factual challenge can ever exist.
- The actual grant’s conditions disappear in every case.
- Clear contrary evidence is categorically irrelevant.
Legal references
- Trillanes IV v. Medialdea, G.R. Nos. 241494, 256660 and 256078, April 3, 2024, en banc main decision, administrative implementation and amnesty evidence: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/apr2024/gr_241494_2024.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.