Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Reiteración or Habituality

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

An offender has been punished for only one prior crime carrying a lighter legal penalty than the new offense. No equal-or-greater prior offense or second lighter prior crime exists. Does that history alone satisfy Article14(10)'s lighter-penalty alternative?
  1. Yes; one lighter prior crime always suffices.
  2. No; that alternative requires two or more prior crimes.
  3. Yes; the prosecution may ignore the word 'two.'
  4. Yes; every prior offense has the same effect.
  5. No; because lighter prior crimes can never qualify.

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/acts/act1930/act_3815_1930.html — Revised Penal Code Article14(10), reiteración or habituality.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1996/sep1996/gr_109767_1996.html — People v. Monterey, G.R.109767, September3 1996, main opinion on Article14(10); no obsolete penalty amounts applied.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.