Philippine Bar review · Topic
Principals, Accomplices, and Accessories
Explore Principals, Accomplices, and Accessories in Participation in Acts Giving Rise to Criminal Liability for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which is an express category of principal under Article17?
- How does Article18 describe an accomplice?
- What timing characterizes the conduct of an accessory under Article19?
- A person knowingly destroys the instrument of a completed crime to prevent discovery and did not participate as princip…
- Which cooperation is expressly included in Article17’s principal category rather than merely assumed to be accomplice p…
- After a completed offense, the offender’s spouse knowingly assists him to profit from its proceeds and claims automatic…
- A person is proved to have performed an indispensable act in the agreed execution of an offense. He argues that because…
- Distinguish the statutory participation categories of principal, accomplice and accessory.
- Explain the limit of the family exemption for accessories.
- Why is merely failing to perform the final physical act insufficient to classify a participant as an accessory?
- Which RPC participation categories are expressly listed for light felonies in Article16?
- Does Article17 expressly recognize directly forcing another to commit the offense as a principal mode?