Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: As a Criminal Act

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

An older printed copy gives a low historical fine for conspiracy to treason. The conduct is after RA10951’s effectivity and no later applicable amendment is identified. A prosecutor insists the old print alone controls over the enacted amendment. Which is correct?
  1. Use amended Article115, including its P2000000 conspiracy fine ceiling
  2. An old print repeals RA10951
  3. The oldest text always controls future conduct
  4. All fines become optional when copies differ
  5. The court may choose any amount without the statutory ceiling

Legal references

  • Revised Penal Code Articles4–5,8,16–22,59, specified provisions: https://lawphil.net/statutes/acts/act1930/act_3815_1930.html Article8 special criminalization principle.
  • RA10951 Sections4 and6, updated Articles115 and136: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2017/ra_10951_2017.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.