Practice question
A case alleges only conspiracy to commit sedition, with the defined agreement and decision established before any uprising. Does absence of consummated sedition alone necessarily defeat the distinct Article141 charge?
- Yes, preparatory conspiracy is never punishable
- Yes, Article141 concerns only theft
- No; Article141 expressly penalizes conspiracy to commit sedition as the defined separate act
- Yes, only the completed uprising can ever be addressed
- No proof of the agreement is needed
Legal references
- RA10951, Section8, amended Article141; RPC Article8: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2017/ra_10951_2017.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.