Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Intent and Motive

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A person intentionally destroys another’s property to retaliate for an insult. For the distinction alone, what is the retaliatory reason?
  1. The punishment
  2. The motive
  3. A judicial defense automatically excusing the act
  4. The court’s jurisdiction
  5. Proof that the act was involuntary

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/acts/act1930/act_3815_1930.html — RPC Article 3: deliberate intent and fault.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1998/jan1998/gr_120921_1998.html — People v. Ballesteros, G.R. 120921, January 29, 1998, main decision: motive distinguished from intent and motive alone insufficient.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2023/mar2023/gr_228232_2023.html — Pineda v. People, G.R. 228232, March 27, 2023, main decision: intent, motive and culpable negligence.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.