Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Mitigating Circumstances

Multiple Choice Medium Jurisprudence

Practice question

A remote grievance is invoked as passion or obfuscation, but a considerable interval allowed recovery of normal composure and no qualifying immediate stimulus is established. Which is best?
  1. Every old resentment remains mitigating forever.
  2. Time can never affect the inquiry.
  3. A prior dispute conclusively overcomes reason at every later date.
  4. A revenge plan automatically qualifies.
  5. The timing and recovery issue must be addressed; an old grievance alone is not automatic mitigation.

Legal references

  • Revised Penal Code, Article 13(6), (8)-(10), cited mitigating circumstances: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/28/20426
  • People v. Singcol, G.R. No. 275139, May 7, 2025, main decision, passion and obfuscation: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/may2025/gr_275139_2025.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.