Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Actus Reus and Mens Rea

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

In darkness a person honestly and without negligence mistakes an apparent armed attacker for an unlawful aggressor. The stipulated supposed facts would fully justify the defensive act, and all mistake-of-fact requirements are proved. Does the fact that the blow was physically deliberate alone defeat the defense?
  1. Yes, the supposed facts never matter
  2. Yes, every intentional movement excludes mistake of fact
  3. Yes, a mistaken defensive act is always murder
  4. No
  5. Yes, harm conclusively proves criminal intent

Legal references

  • Revised Penal Code, Articles3-4 and49, as applicable: https://lawphil.net/statutes/acts/act1930/act_3815_1930.html
  • United States v. Ah Chong, GR L-5272, March19 1910, mistake-of-fact principles: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1910/mar1910/gr_l-5272_1910.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.