Practice question
A valid necessity intervention benefits several persons, but their respective benefits cannot equitably be estimated even approximately. The actor proposes an invented fifty-fifty allocation without identifying any governing special rule. Which is sound?
- An unknowable ratio automatically proves equal benefit.
- Every allocation must be exactly fifty-fifty.
- No applicable legal rule need be examined.
- Identify the applicable special laws or regulations rather than substitute the invented universal split.
- The most outspoken beneficiary alone pays everything.
Legal references
- Revised Penal Code, Article 101, second rule and special-law allocation situations: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/28/20426
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.