Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: New Anti-Carnapping Act of 2016 (RA 10883, Secs. 2–4)

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A corporation's workshop conceals a carnapped vehicle. Evidence identifies the manager who directly arranged the concealment, but establishes no participation by several other directors. The prosecutor says Section 4 automatically imprisons every director solely because of office. Which is correct?
  1. Every corporate title alone conclusively establishes personal guilt.
  2. Section 4 requires attention to direct participation by the officers or employees on whom its corporate penalty is imposed.
  3. Only the corporation may ever be punished, not a natural person.
  4. No concealment offense exists if a corporation owns the workshop.
  5. A director's unrelated shareholding necessarily proves concealment.

Legal references

  • RA 10883, Sections 2–4, motor vehicles, carnapping and concealment: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2016/ra_10883_2016.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.