Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Crimes Against International Humanitarian Law, Genocide, and Other Crimes Against Humanity (RA 9851, Ch. III)

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

During an armed conflict, a commander launches an attack on a military objective knowing it will cause incidental civilian deaths excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. He claims a military target always makes incidental civilian harm lawful. Which is correct under section 4(c)(5)?
  1. Correct, because a military objective removes every proportionality limit
  2. Correct, unless every civilian is killed
  3. Incorrect, because the provision prohibits the knowing launch of the described excessively harmful attack
  4. Incorrect, because every attack on a military objective is necessarily genocide
  5. Correct, if the attack was announced on social media

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2009/ra_9851_2009.html — RA 9851, Chapter III, sections 4–6, war crimes, genocide, direct public incitement and other crimes against humanity; section 3 supplies the related contextual definitions.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.