Practice question
A firearm business commits a Section32 violation through officers who knowingly and willingly participate. A bookkeeper with no participation is also charged solely because she is employed there. Which statutory distinction matters?
- Corporate-position liability under that clause requires the stated knowing and willing participation
- Every employee is automatically guilty
- Only the youngest officer is liable
- Corporate form immunizes all officers
- A payroll entry conclusively establishes participation
Legal references
- RA10591 Sections32,34 and36–39: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2013/ra_10591_2013.html
- RA11766 amendment context, Sections7/19: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11766_2022.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.