Practice question
A buyer knowingly receives firearm parts stolen from the licensed dealer by its employee. Which Section32 point defeats the argument that only the employee is addressed?
- The knowing buyer or possessor is also expressly covered
- Every buyer is immune
- Only dealer directors can offend
- Knowledge has no statutory relevance
- Only a completed shooting is covered
Legal references
- RA10591 Sections32,34 and36–39: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2013/ra_10591_2013.html
- RA11766 amendment context, Sections7/19: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11766_2022.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.