Practice question
An official ostensibly transfers a conflicting interest to an unrelated nominee but retains actual ownership rights and binding control by secret agreement. All relevant facts are proved. Does unrelated nominee status alone satisfy Section3(j)?
- No; complete and actual dispossession is still required
- Yes, unrelated names automatically validate retained ownership
- Yes, hidden control is expressly required
- Only the nominee’s address matters
- No substantive divestment test exists
Legal references
- RA6713 Sections3(i)-(k) and9, conflict and divestment: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1989/ra_6713_1989.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.