Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Arson Law (PD 1613)

Essay Medium Jurisprudence

Practice question

Discuss proof of intentional burning and Section 6's prima facie circumstances. Is an eyewitness always indispensable, and is a listed circumstance conclusive?

Legal references

  • PD 1613, Sections 1, 3–7, simple arson, read with later destructive-arson law and RA 9346: https://lawphil.net/statutes/presdecs/pd1979/pd_1613_1979.html
  • People v Soriano, G.R. No. 142565, July 29, 2003, main decision, simple and destructive arson classification (not obsolete death penalties): https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/48902
  • RA 9346, Sections 1–4, death-penalty prohibition, substitute penalties and clemency: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2006/ra_9346_2006.html
  • Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 110 Sections 8–9, allegation of qualifying and aggravating circumstances: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.