Practice question
A covered respondent uses another person to stalk and harass the woman, causing the substantial distress required by Section5(h). All facts are proved. Is lack of personal appearance a complete defense?
- Only the intermediary’s name matters
- Yes, indirect conduct is expressly excluded
- Yes, hiring another always eliminates responsibility
- Yes, only visible injury counts
- No
Legal references
- RA9262 Sections3(f),(h),5(f),(h) and6: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2004/ra_9262_2004.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.