Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act (RA 9208, Secs. 3–6 and 10–12, as amended by RA 10364, 11862, and 12312)

Multiple Choice Easy Jurisprudence

Practice question

For recruitment of a child for an exploitative purpose within the statutory definition, must the prosecution additionally prove one of the adult-trafficking means such as force or deception?
  1. Yes, force must always be proved.
  2. Yes, deception is indispensable even for children.
  3. No; the child-trafficking definition dispenses with those means while retaining the relevant act and exploitative purpose.
  4. No, because exploitative purpose is unnecessary too.
  5. Yes, unless the child objects in writing.

Legal references

  • RA 11862, Sections 3–6 amending RA 9208 definitions, acts, facilitation and qualifications: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11862_2022.html
  • RA 10364, retained amendments to RA 9208, read with RA 11862: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2013/ra_10364_2013.html
  • RA 12312, Sections 9 and 17, offshore-gaming recruitment and amendment of trafficking law: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/100174

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.