Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act (RA 9208, Secs. 3–6 and 10–12, as amended by RA 10364, 11862, and 12312)

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

After RA 12312 became applicable, a recruiter hires Filipinos and foreign nationals for employment in an offshore-gaming operation in the Philippines. He calls the arrangement a voluntary training program and claims the 2025 law has no link to trafficking legislation. What is the correct statutory response?
  1. The law exempts all training arrangements.
  2. Only Filipino recruits are covered.
  3. Section 9 specifically prohibits the stated offshore-gaming employment, training, or apprenticeship recruitment and links the conduct to the trafficking law.
  4. Only a change of business name is required.
  5. A former offshore-gaming license conclusively authorizes continued recruitment.

Legal references

  • RA 11862, Sections 3–6 amending RA 9208 definitions, acts, facilitation and qualifications: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11862_2022.html
  • RA 10364, retained amendments to RA 9208, read with RA 11862: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2013/ra_10364_2013.html
  • RA 12312, Sections 9 and 17, offshore-gaming recruitment and amendment of trafficking law: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/100174

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.