Philippine Bar review · Topic
Anti-Plunder Act (RA 7080, as amended by RA 7659)
Page 2 of practice questions on Anti-Plunder Act (RA 7080, as amended by RA 7659) in SPECIAL PENAL LAWS. Browse published questions and explore related topics…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does the statutory forfeiture clause cover only the original ill-gotten principal and exclude its investment returns?
- An officer invests proved plunder proceeds in shares and earns dividends. The lawful forfeiture issue is before the cou…
- A private associate knowingly participates with the public officer in the proved commission of plunder. He argues only …
- A public officer has a valid plunder information pending in court. He says Section5 suspension can never arise before a…
- Property unlawfully acquired by an officer is traced to a nominee. The nominee relies solely on delay and estoppel to d…
- Distinguish criminal prescription under Section6 from recovery of unlawfully acquired property.
- Explain why converting plunder proceeds into shares or income does not necessarily defeat forfeiture.
- A private associate says lack of public office alone defeats a plunder charge despite his proved participation with the…