Philippine Bar review · Topic
Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children and Anti- Child Sexual Abuse or Exploitation Materials Act (RA 11930, Secs. 3–14 and 25)
Page 2 of practice questions on Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children and Anti- Child Sexual Abuse or Exploitation Materials Act (RA 11930…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- For a juridical offender, does merely holding an unrelated job necessarily satisfy Section11’s stated officer-liability…
- A corporate manager knowingly permits the corporation’s RA11930 crime. He argues incorporation necessarily excludes his…
- A parent is pressured to execute desistance to end an OSAEC prosecution. What does Section25 say about undue pressure i…
- A continuing RA11930 offense commences in the Philippines and is carried out further abroad. The accused argues foreign…
- A foreign government with jurisdiction recognized by the Philippines is already prosecuting the same conduct covered by…
- Explain why an affidavit of desistance is not an automatic exit from an RA11930 prosecution.
- Explain Section11’s treatment of a juridical offender and its responsible officers.
- Distinguish the continuing-offense commencement rule and the existing-foreign-prosecution restriction in Section14.