Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (RA 3019, as amended by BP 195 and RA 10910)

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A private consultant knowingly induces an officer to grant a permit to a proved legally unqualified dummy, and all elements of Section 3(j) are established. The consultant argues that only public officers can incur any liability under RA 3019. Which is correct?
  1. Every private individual is categorically exempt from RA 3019.
  2. Section 4(b) expressly addresses knowingly inducing or causing a public official to commit a Section 3 offense.
  3. Inducement can never matter without a family relationship.
  4. Section 4(b) requires that the consultant hold elective office.
  5. Only a consultant’s professional title determines guilt.

Legal references

  • RA 3019, Sections 3(f), 3(h), 3(j), 3(k) and 4, substantive prohibited acts: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1960/ra_3019_1960.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.