Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (RA 3019, as amended by BP 195 and RA 10910)

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A board member secretly acquires a material interest for personal gain in a transaction requiring his board’s discretionary approval. He later abstains from the vote and argues that abstention necessarily excludes section 3(i). Which is correct?
  1. Abstention invariably cures the prohibited material interest
  2. Only the board chair can violate section 3(i)
  3. The provision applies only if the transaction loses money
  4. The provision expressly reaches the specified interest even if he votes against the transaction or does not participate in the board action
  5. His vote would matter only if cast in writing

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1960/ra_3019_1960.html — RA 3019, section 3(b), (c), (d), (e), (g) and (i), prohibited practices.
  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/bataspam/bp1982/bp_195_1982.html — sections 2 and 4, amended RA 3019 penalty and earlier prescription provision.
  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2016/ra_10910_2016.html — section 1, current twenty-year statutory prescriptive period.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.