Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Anti-Financial Account Scamming Act (RA 12010, Secs. 3–5 and 16–21)

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A person opens a financial account using another person’s identification documents. The prosecution invokes Section 5(c), not the separate money-muling provision requiring the specified known-proceeds purpose. Which is correct?
  1. Section 5 contains no account-opening offense.
  2. Every Section 5 charge requires proof of three conspirators.
  3. Every such account is lawful if no completed withdrawal is proved.
  4. The statutory text addresses only paper checks.
  5. Section 5(c) expressly identifies that account-opening act as a separate offense.

Legal references

  • RA 12010, Sections 3-5 and 16, AFASA definitions, separate offenses and penalties: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2024/ra_12010_2024.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.