Practice question
An offender possesses a skimming device proved to have been used to perpetrate the listed access-device acts and satisfies amended Section9(r). The offender says absence of a plastic card in the offender’s pocket necessarily defeats every hardware charge. Which is correct?
- The hardware component is separately covered by the provision
- Only possession of a plastic card can ever be unlawful
- Every device is immune if wireless
- Hardware is expressly excluded
- The offender’s preferred product name controls
Legal references
- RA11449 Section3, amended RA8484 Section9(r); retained RA8484 Sections13 and17: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2019/ra_11449_2019.html ; https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1998/ra_8484_1998.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.