Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Access Devices Regulation Act (RA 8484, Secs. 3, 9–14, and 17, as amended by RA 11449)

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A dealer knowingly buys goods acquired through a counterfeit access device, intending gain, with all Section13 requirements proved. The dealer argues that only the person who physically used the card can ever be liable under the Act. What provision addresses the dealer?
  1. No post-fraud dealing is addressed
  2. A rule exempting every later dealer
  3. Only a private return policy
  4. Only the cardholder’s tax duty
  5. The separate accessory-to-access-device-fraud provision

Legal references

  • RA11449 Section3, amended RA8484 Section9(r); retained RA8484 Sections13 and17: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2019/ra_11449_2019.html ; https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1998/ra_8484_1998.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.