Philippine Bar review · Topic
Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege
Page 2 of practice questions on Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege in FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LAW. Browse published questions and explore related…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Can a public-interest policy statement alone supply unlimited agency power to prescribe any criminal offense and penalt…
- An enabling statute authorizes implementation within defined prohibitions and fixes a maximum fine. A circular independ…
- A valid statute already defines prohibited conduct and its penalty and authorizes technical implementation. A regulatio…
- In evaluating the historical 1969 charge addressed in Maceren under the old fisheries law, a prosecutor invokes later l…
- An agency invokes broad conservation purposes to punish an activity outside the enabling statute’s authorized penal sco…
- Explain the distinction between authorized administrative details and unauthorized crime creation under Maceren.
- Why does later express criminalization not automatically cure an earlier ultra vires regulation for historical conduct?
- An agency argues that an important public-interest goal permits any preferred penal sanction. Evaluate.