Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Suppletory Application of the Revised Penal Code

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A new special penal statute contains a complete express rule on a particular issue and a separate gap on another. Counsel insists that Article 10 requires either applying every RPC provision wholesale or excluding the Code altogether. Which method is correct?
  1. The court must always choose wholesale application.
  2. The court must always exclude the Code.
  3. The court may create a new offense to fill any perceived gap.
  4. The court should respect the express special rule and separately assess whether a compatible RPC provision properly supplements the uncovered issue.
  5. The accused’s occupation decides which statute exists.

Legal references

  • Revised Penal Code, Act No. 3815, specified articles, as amended: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/28/20426; Articles 8 and 10.
  • Ladonga v People, G.R. No. 141066, February 17, 2005, main decision, Article 10 and proof of conspiracy: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2005/feb2005/gr_141066_2005.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.