Philippine Bar review · Topic
Excessive Fines; Cruel, Degrading, or Inhuman Punishment
Explore Excessive Fines; Cruel, Degrading, or Inhuman Punishment in Constitutional Limitations on the Power to Enact Penal Laws for the Philippine Bar. Browse…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which is expressly prohibited by Article III section 19?
- As of the June 30, 2026 cutoff, what does RA 9346 provide regarding imposition of the death penalty?
- Is reclusion perpetua automatically cruel, degrading or inhuman punishment merely because it is severe?
- A statute using RPC penalty nomenclature formerly prescribed death. RA 9346 applies. Which substitute does section 2 sp…
- Prison officials argue that degrading psychological treatment and subhuman detention facilities cannot raise constituti…
- A penal law imposes a substantial fine for a serious offense. An accused argues that a large number alone makes it exce…
- In June2026, a court is asked to impose death because an older penal provision still prints that penalty and the prosec…
- A defendant challenges a criminal fine as excessive solely because it is large. The prosecution replies that any amount…
- Explain the current effect of RA 9346 on an older death-penalty provision. Distinguish the substitute where the violate…
- A convicted prisoner challenges degrading treatment and subhuman detention facilities. Officials argue that a valid sen…
- Does RA9745 allow a public emergency to justify torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment?
- Can prohibited torture be psychological or mental rather than solely physical?