Practice question
Congress seeks faster convictions for a serious offense and permits punishment on an accusation that the accused is not allowed to contest. Explain why a valuable public objective does not itself resolve the due-process objection.
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html — Constitution, Article III sections1 and14: due process, fair accusation, hearing and presumption of innocence.
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2001/nov2001/gr_148560_2001.html — Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. 148560, November 19, 2001, main decision: fair notice, objective standards and vagueness; not relied upon for historical death-penalty provisions.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.