Philippine Bar review · Topic
Extraordinary Diligence
Explore Extraordinary Diligence in Common Carriers for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What general diligence standard does Article 1733 impose on common carriers?
- Under Article 1755, what care is required for passenger safety?
- What is the Article 1756 presumption when a passenger dies or is injured in the relevant carriage?
- Cargo is temporarily unloaded into the carrier’s transit warehouse. No stoppage in transitu is exercised. The carrier c…
- An injured passenger’s carrier proves only ordinary diligence in selecting and supervising its negligent employee. Does…
- Goods reach the carrier’s destination warehouse. The consignee has not been advised of arrival and has had no reasonabl…
- A paying passenger’s ticket says the carrier owes only minimal care and is never responsible for employee negligence. T…
- Explain extraordinary diligence for passengers and the related presumption of negligence.
- Describe the duration of extraordinary responsibility over goods under Articles 1736–1738.
- Why are ordinary employee-selection precautions or a ticket disclaimer insufficient by themselves to remove the carrier…
- Under Article 1759, can a common carrier escape passenger-injury responsibility merely because its employee violated co…
- Under Article 1763, what employee-prevention standard governs passenger injury caused by another passenger or stranger?