Philippine Bar review · Topic
Common Carrier vs. Private Carrier
Explore Common Carrier vs. Private Carrier in Common Carriers for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which element appears in Article 1732’s common-carrier definition?
- Under De Guzman, must transportation be the operator’s principal occupation before common-carrier status can arise?
- Does serving a limited clientele necessarily exclude common-carrier status?
- A scrap dealer regularly offers merchants paid transport on return trips. Carriage is ancillary and trips are irregular…
- A manufacturer moves only its own products between its own facilities and does not offer carriage services for compensa…
- An operator otherwise satisfies Article 1732 but never secured the necessary carrier permit. After cargo loss, it argue…
- A transport company openly offers paid hauling to a sector of local businesses. Each customer signs a document headed P…
- State the Article 1732 definition and explain two distinctions rejected in De Guzman.
- Explain why a private-carriage label or absence of a carrier permit does not alone resolve classification.
- Compare a business carrying only its own goods with one offering merchants paid hauling as an ancillary activity. What …
- Did First Philippine Industrial exclude pipeline transport from common-carrier status merely because it uses no truck o…
- How did Perena classify the paid school-bus service at issue?