Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Effect of Failure to Appeal

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A company elects under Lascona to await the CIR's decision after the 180-day action period. It later validly receives the CIR's adverse final decision but lets the thirty-day appeal period expire, claiming the original waiting election permits it to wait indefinitely even after decision. What is correct?
  1. The waiting option does not eliminate the appeal deadline triggered by the eventual valid final decision
  2. The election permanently suspends every future deadline
  3. Only the company's preferred filing date matters
  4. The decision automatically becomes a refund certificate
  5. No court can review tax decisions

Legal references

  • NIRC Sections204,228 and229: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/3896
  • Lascona Land v. CIR, GR171251, March5 2012, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2012/mar2012/gr_171251_2012.html
  • RA9282 amending RA1125, CTA appeal provisions: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2004/ra_9282_2004.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.